<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel>
<title>Science of Placebo: new papers</title><link>https://scienceofplacebo.org/</link>
<description>Newly published peer-reviewed studies of placebo and nocebo effects and responses.</description>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 14:18:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
<item><title>Immediate effects of spinal manipulation, exercise therapy, and open-label placebo on lifting performance and pain in individuals with chronic non-specific back pain: a motion laboratory-based crossover randomized controlled trial.</title><link>https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-026-00680-w</link><guid isPermaLink="false">doi:10.1186/s12998-026-00680-w</guid><description>Borg F et al. (2026). Chiropr Man Therap. Tested immediate effects of spinal manipulation, exercise therapy, and open-label placebo on lifting biomechanics and pain in 50 people with chronic non-specific back pain in a crossover motion-lab RCT; found limited overall effects but some within-group biomechanical and pain changes.</description></item>
<item><title>Open-label placebo treatment for acute postoperative pain (OLP-POP study): a randomized controlled trial.</title><link>https://doi.org/10.1097/pr9.0000000000001405</link><guid isPermaLink="false">doi:10.1097/pr9.0000000000001405</guid><description>Sezer D et al. (2026). Pain Rep. Randomized trial tested two daily open-label placebo injections plus usual care versus usual care after dorsal lumbar interbody fusion and found no reduction in 48-hour morphine consumption.</description></item>
<item><title>Quantitative assessment of neurokinin receptor antagonists in menopausal hot flashes: a model-based meta-analysis.</title><link>https://doi.org/10.1097/gme.0000000000002909</link><guid isPermaLink="false">doi:10.1097/gme.0000000000002909</guid><description>Wang S et al. (2026). Menopause. Performed a model-based meta-analysis of NK3-receptor antagonist trials for menopausal hot flashes, quantified drug dose-response and time-course, and found elevated placebo responses in these trials compared with other nonhormone studies.</description></item>
<item><title>Peripheral CCK and ß-Endorphin as Potential Neuroendocrine Markers of Nocebo Effects: Evidence from a Multiple-Threat Pain Paradigm.</title><link>https://doi.org/10.1159/nim/adxag011</link><guid isPermaLink="false">doi:10.1159/nim/adxag011</guid><description>Köhler A et al. (2026). Neuroimmunomodulation. Randomized healthy volunteers received negative versus neutral verbal suggestions and adverse versus neutral treatment experiences; nocebo responders showed higher peripheral CCK during treatment, and women had higher β-endorphin across groups.</description></item>
<item><title>Sweet Relief: Behaviorally conditioned analgesia in rats with inflammatory pain.</title><link>https://doi.org/10.1159/nim/adxag010</link><guid isPermaLink="false">doi:10.1159/nim/adxag010</guid><description>Leisengang S et al. (2026). Neuroimmunomodulation. Used saccharin paired with ibuprofen in CFA-inflamed rats to produce conditioned analgesia, and conditioned animals showed elevated mechanical and thermal withdrawal thresholds versus non-conditioned controls.</description></item>
<item><title>The Neurophysiology of the Placebo Effect: A Systematic Review</title><link>https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/f5gxn</link><guid isPermaLink="false">doi:10.17605/osf.io/f5gxn</guid><description>Stephany Campanelli Esmaile (2026). OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints). Systematic review synthesized randomized human studies of neuroimaging and electrophysiological correlates of placebo effects and placebo responses, including 31 studies.</description></item>
<item><title>20.4 Neuroimaging Predictors of Placebo Response in Depressed or Anxious Youth With a Family History of Bipolar Disorder</title><link>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2026.07.1005</link><guid isPermaLink="false">doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2026.07.1005</guid><description>Manpreet K. Singh et al. (2026). Journal of the American Academy of Child &amp; Adolescent Psychiatry. Studied neuroimaging predictors of placebo response in depressed or anxious youth with family history of bipolar disorder; predictors were the analytic focus.</description></item>
<item><title>Social media use and expectations predict COVID-19 vaccine side effects: a prospective longitudinal study.</title><link>https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1730585</link><guid isPermaLink="false">doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1730585</guid><description>Tan W et al. (2026). Front Psychol. Found that exposure to social-media reports of COVID-19 vaccine side effects predicted greater self-reported side-effect burden after the first dose, with this association mediated by pre-vaccination expectations and moderated by worry and misinformation.</description></item>
<item><title>Magnitude and Moderators of Depressive Symptom Improvement in Digital Placebo Arms: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.</title><link>https://doi.org/10.2196/100426</link><guid isPermaLink="false">doi:10.2196/100426</guid><description>Hosono T et al. (2026). J Med Internet Res. Meta-analyzed 30 RCTs and found a pooled PHQ-9 within-control improvement (Hedges' g=0.44) in digital placebo arms and identified primary psychiatric status and baseline severity as moderators.</description></item>
<item><title>Investigating the contextual modulation of postoperative gastrointestinal motility: a methodological feasibility study combining a standardized intervention protocol with wireless motility capsule monitoring</title><link>https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1913608</link><guid isPermaLink="false">doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1913608</guid><description>Martin Coenen et al. (2026). Frontiers in Psychology. Conducted a feasibility study combining a standardized contextually-enhanced drug administration by senior physicians with continuous SmartPill® motility monitoring after abdominal surgery and found the protocol operationally feasible but no consistent physiological motility improvements.</description></item>
<item><title>The role of sham surgery in orthopedic practice: a systematic review and metaanalysis</title><link>https://doi.org/10.24911/amem.15-2963</link><guid isPermaLink="false">doi:10.24911/amem.15-2963</guid><description>Khalaf A. Alnowaishiri et al. (2026). Annals of Middle Eastern Medicine. Meta-analysis of seven studies compared sham and real orthopedic surgeries and found real surgery superior for pain but no significant differences for function or quality of life; adverse events trended higher with real surgery.</description></item>
<item><title>Expectation shapes hunger and craving: placebo effects of verbal suggestion on food-related experiences.</title><link>https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kaag036</link><guid isPermaLink="false">doi:10.1093/abm/kaag036</guid><description>Al-Awan Z et al. (2026). Ann Behav Med. Randomized single-blind sham-vagus stimulation with hunger-increasing, hunger-decreasing, or neutral verbal suggestions found that suggestions altered self-reported hunger and craving but not food desirability or choices.</description></item>
<item><title>Interrogating side effects: The role of social information in treatment expectancies.</title><link>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2026.105167</link><guid isPermaLink="false">doi:10.1016/j.brat.2026.105167</guid><description>Rooney T et al. (2026). Behav Res Ther. Found that actively selecting more negative anecdotes about a medication increased expectancies and worry about side effects and reduced willingness to try the treatment.</description></item>
<item><title>A meta-analysis of pain intensity changes after placebo interventions in facial pain.</title><link>https://doi.org/10.1097/pr9.0000000000001499</link><guid isPermaLink="false">doi:10.1097/pr9.0000000000001499</guid><description>Saluja S et al. (2026). Pain Rep. Pooled data from 115 studies of facial pain showed placebo/sham arms produced an average ~29.7% pain reduction, with substantial between-study variability and diagnosis-related differences.</description></item>
<item><title>The Impact of Placebo Analgesia on Pressure Pain Threshold and Tolerance: A Gender-Based Experimental Study in Young Adults</title><link>https://doi.org/10.13005/bpj/3531</link><guid isPermaLink="false">doi:10.13005/bpj/3531</guid><description>Salma Amr et al. (2026). Biomedical &amp; Pharmacology Journal. Administered a saline spray presented as an analgesic to 161 young adults and found significant increases in pressure pain threshold and tolerance, with larger effects on tolerance and persistent gender differences.</description></item>
<item><title>Placebo Pain Relief: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Opportunities.</title><link>https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-060225-124705</link><guid isPermaLink="false">doi:10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-060225-124705</guid><description>Chen C &amp; Scherrer G (2026). Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. Reviews recent human and preclinical evidence on psychological, neural, and molecular mechanisms of placebo analgesia and discusses strategies to ethically harness these mechanisms in clinical pain management.</description></item>
<item><title>Beyond pharmacology: The mediating role of expectations in the experience of side effects in anxious patients treated with secukinumab. How anxiety is linked to nocebo effects</title><link>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbih.2026.101376</link><guid isPermaLink="false">doi:10.1016/j.bbih.2026.101376</guid><description>Senta Mühlhaus et al. (2026). Brain Behavior &amp; Immunity - Health. Found that higher trait anxiety predicted more self-reported side effects at week 4 during secukinumab therapy, and this association was mediated by baseline side-effect expectations; effects diminished by week 16.</description></item>
<item><title>Clinical Outcomes in Placebo-Injection and Injection-Free Cohorts in Birch Pollen Allergy: An Exploratory Cross-Study Comparison</title><link>https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15197637</link><guid isPermaLink="false">doi:10.3390/jcm15197637</guid><description>Esther Raskopf et al. (2026). Journal of Clinical Medicine. Conducted a post hoc cross-study comparison and found that placebo-injection cohorts had lower symptom and medication scores than an injection-free cohort in birch pollen-allergic participants.</description></item>
<item><title>Treatment Expectation across Open-Label Placebo and Pharmacological Contexts: A Randomized Clinical Trial in Chronic Low Back Pain.</title><link>https://doi.org/10.1159/pps/aemag014</link><guid isPermaLink="false">doi:10.1159/pps/aemag014</guid><description>Winkler E et al. (2026). Psychother Psychosom. Randomized trial found that open-label placebo combined with social observational learning produced clinically meaningful pain reductions in chronic low back pain comparable to active medication, and that expected pain relief predicted outcomes.</description></item>
<item><title>Overall and specific treatment effects of pharmacological interventions for hand osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.</title><link>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2026.09.012</link><guid isPermaLink="false">doi:10.1016/j.joca.2026.09.012</guid><description>Wen Z et al. (2026). Osteoarthritis Cartilage. Pooled 34 RCTs (3,763 participants) and quantified overall treatment and contextual (placebo) effects for pharmacological interventions in hand osteoarthritis, finding that much of topical NSAID benefit was attributable to contextual effects.</description></item>
<item><title>Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (TDCS) at Fp3-Fp2 Reduces the Face Inversion Effect: Evidence Against an Expectancy Account.</title><link>https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci16091000</link><guid isPermaLink="false">doi:10.3390/brainsci16091000</guid><description>Civile C (2026). Brain Sci. Tested whether participating in a tDCS study (sham) altered face-recognition performance versus a no-tDCS control and found no evidence that expectancy changed performance; anodal tDCS reduced the face inversion effect.</description></item>
<item><title>Meta-Analysis: The Placebo Response in Modern Treatments for Cholestatic Pruritus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.</title><link>https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70915</link><guid isPermaLink="false">doi:10.1111/apt.70915</guid><description>Silveira IB et al. (2026). Aliment Pharmacol Ther. Found that placebo groups in cholestatic-pruritus trials showed a moderate, clinically variable reduction in itch scores (pooled SMC -0.49) and that instrument choice affected detection of change.</description></item>
<item><title>Carbohydrate mouth rinse and performance in cyclists: effects of different types of carbohydrates and the placebo effect induced by mouth rinse.</title><link>https://doi.org/10.1080/15438627.2026.2736778</link><guid isPermaLink="false">doi:10.1080/15438627.2026.2736778</guid><description>Mendonça MEF et al. (2026). Res Sports Med. Randomized double-blind crossover in 12 male amateur cyclists tested maltodextrin, fructose, placebo mouth rinses and no-rinse control; rinsing did not change 15-min time-trial power output, and no placebo effect was observed.</description></item>
<item><title>Comparative Effectiveness of Spinal Manipulation for Low Back Pain: A Bayesian Hierarchical Analysis Incorporating Natural History</title><link>https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.09.16.26359287</link><guid isPermaLink="false">doi:10.64898/2026.09.16.26359287</guid><description>J. Michael Menke et al. (2026). medRxiv. Pooled Bayesian analysis of 120 trials modeled natural history and control conditions, found control arms exceeded natural history in chronic low back pain (consistent with substantial placebo response) while sham-corrected effects were near zero in acute LBP.</description></item>
</channel></rss>